实验室团队与中南大学湘雅二医院研究团队合作在《Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy》发表了论文
2025年3月29日
获取原文：
围产期丧失对女性心理健康具有深远影响，然而，这种哀伤常因文化或社会因素被忽视，加剧了女性的心理负担。现有的围产期哀伤量表简版（SVPGS）虽在全球广泛应用，但在中国人群中的心理测量特性尚未得到完全验证。基于此，实验室负责人唐苏勤副教授带领实验室研究生李斯妮与中南大学湘雅二医院研究团队合作撰写文章“Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study”于2025年3月29日在《Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy》上发表。本研究旨在通过验证并优化SVPGS在中国大陆经历围产期丧失女性中的心理测量特性，提升其适用性。结果表明，优化后的15项SVPGS是评估中国大陆女性围产期哀伤的简明、可靠且有效的工具。未来需进一步验证其在不同文化和人群中的普适性，以支持临床干预和跨文化研究。
摘要
Background
The Short Version of the Perinatal Grief Scale (SVPGS) is a widely used scale of grief related to perinatal loss. This study aims to validate and refine the SVPGS among Chinese women experiencing perinatal loss by addressing its psychometric properties.
Methods
After translating the SVPGS from English to Chinese and conducting a pre-test with 20 end-users, followed by an assessment of content validity involving 10 experts, a cross-sectional study was conducted to assess its internal reliability and structure, concurrent, convergent, divergent, known-group validities among 353 women who have experienced perinatal loss across eight hospitals in Hunan Province, China. A subset of 275 participants were reassessed over a 1-month interval for the test–retest reliability.
Results
The refined 15-item SVPGS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92) and strong 1-month test–retest reliability (κ = 0.83) compared to the original SVPGS. A three-factor structure consisting of 15 items was confirmed through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and parallel analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis further validated this structure, indicating a good fit for the refined SVPGS. Concurrent validity was supported by a large correlation between the SVPGS and refined SVPGS (r = 0.90, p < 0.01). Convergent and divergent validities were confirmed through significant correlations with variables including depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, perceived social support, and quality of life. Known-group validation revealed significant differences in these variables between high and low levels of the refined SVPGS.
Conclusions
These findings indicate that the refined SVPGS is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for measuring grief in women who have experienced perinatal loss. Future research is strongly recommended to test the refined SVPGS across diverse samples and cultural contexts to enhance its generalizability.