唐苏勤副教授与北京师范大学等合作在《European Journal of Psychotraumatology》发表了论文
2025年7月7日
获取原文：
丧失亲友是大学生面临的主要压力源之一，可能引发持续的哀伤反应。基于哀伤结果的整合风险因素预测框架，目前“未竟事务”与“持续性联结”在大学生哀伤发展中的作用机制尚未在中国文化背景下得到系统检验。为此，研究团队开展了为期三波、间隔3个月的纵向研究，撰写了相关论文。本研究旨在探索丧亲大学生的未竟事务与哀伤之间的关系，以及内化持续性联结（ICBs）与外化持续性联结（ECBs）在其中的作用。结果表明，未竟事务能持续正向预测哀伤；同时，早期的未竟事务可正向预测随后的内化联结，而内化联结能负向预测后续哀伤，外化联结则正向预测后续哀伤。研究发现，未竟事务在大学生哀伤适应中扮演关键角色，在哀伤咨询中应特别重视培养逝者的内化持续性联结，以更有效地帮助他们融入日常生活。未来研究可进一步探讨不同文化背景下持续性联结的表现形式及其干预意义。
摘要
Five dimensions of grief rumination were identified: meaning, relationships, counterfactuals, injustice, and reactions. Across these dimensions, rumination emerged as a double-edged process. On the one hand, it often intensified emotional suffering, worries about the future, avoidant coping, social withdrawal due to stigma, negative self-evaluation, and fear of losing mental control. On the other hand, it could also open up space for cognitive reappraisal, reconstruction of life meaning, recognition of remaining social resources, more bearable acceptance of the loss, future-oriented reorientation, and greater self-understanding. Throughout these dimensions, the content and effects of rumination were shaped by culturally embedded meanings, particularly bloodline continuity, filial obligations, collectivism, and fate or destiny.